Am Freitag, den 18.02.2011, 12:51 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > That's what I am talking about: The Ghostscript project includes all > needed resources as part of a single tarball instead of as isolated > chunks.
Indeed, I understood your initial response the other way round. ;) > Debian has a different objective. And I believe it is better to track > them as a separate entity - a separate upstream project. Even if it > might turn out that the current canonical upstream source for a while is > that same tarball which also holds Ghostscript. Because that might very > well change again in the future! There is a lot of motion currently in the thread that I sent you the link to. Ghostscript is currently even considering reverting back to the original URW++ fonts, but maybe they adopt the Text Gyre fonts or merge the latest urwcyr release. We will see. However, I think the fonts should be split into a separate package and libgs9-common should depend on either this or gsfonts. - Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1298149741.10639.9.camel@debian
