Package: libgs9-common Version: 9.01~dfsg-1 Severity: normal Hi Jonas,
is there a reason why ghostscript ships its own fonts in /usr/share/ghostscript/9.01/Resource/Font in the libgs9-common package but also depends on the gsfonts package? The latter contains modified variants of the exact same fonts with added glyphs under different file names. Is it really necessary to have both font sets installed? - Fabian -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (501, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110218090732.3025.88911.reportbug@vfrodo
