David Kuehling wrote:
[0] http://snapshot.debian.org/package/libzrtpcpp/1.4.0-1/
Nope, [0] is not the correct source. Note that the source is reported
missing for package 'libzrtpcpp-1.4-0/1.4.6-1+b101', which in
debparanoia's notation means 'libzrtpcpp-1.4-0' is the package name and
'1.4.6-1+b101' is the debian package version. (yeah package name
misrepresents version, but that's another problem).
This is the snapshot entry for 1.4.6-1:
http://snapshot.debian.org/package/libzrtpcpp/1.4.6-1/
and there it lists no files under 'source files'.
Maybe the 1.4.6-1 version was so short-lived that snapshot did not pick
up the source package? (it only snapshots every 6 hours !?).
Did I overlook something?
That package entered unstable on Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:35:02 +0000 [0] and
the .1 is from Sat, 21 May 2011 06:02:20 +0000 [1]. So there was sometime
to mirror them.
Yeah the short-lived package problem seems like a plausible theory,
given that snapshot lists a source for the subsequent version 1.4.6-1.1:
http://snapshot.debian.org/package/libzrtpcpp/1.4.6-1.1/
Yes. So we have the orig.tar.gz for 1.4.6-1 it is just not linked there.
We miss however .dsc and .diff.gz for it. I Cc d-snapsnot@l.d.o on that.
[0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/libz/libzrtpcpp/news/20091031T233502Z.html
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/libz/libzrtpcpp/news/20110521T060220Z.html
cheers,
David
Sebastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4df226fa.2010...@linutronix.de
