Thanks!

What we need most is for someone who has familiarity with the configuration options and build procedures for the powerpc kernel and initrd to take a look at the situation and provide us testers with a kernel/initrd to test.

Failing that, I'm willing to try building kernels and initrds with various configuration options and/or patches if someone would be willing to teach me how. I can RTFM, if I know which FM to R.

Willingness aside, I fear that I would be casting about at random, since I know very little of the options that changed during the ppc/ ppc64 -> powerpc transition. Again, we need someone who has some experience in the area to take notice and help out.

Please! Help!

Rick


On Aug 22, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Harold Johnson wrote:

Thanks for explaining this, Sven. I was unaware of the nature of changes that occurred prior to the 2.6.15 kernel, and this gives me a general idea. This also seems to answer the original question posed by Rick Thomas -- the question which began this thread.

Rick, Let me know if there's anything I can test/do to help you get what you need. I know you're wanting 2.6.16, and I haven't had success there yet -- but perhaps I can help in some other way. I currently have a partition available to test on my PowerBook G3. (You'll recall, it's a "Wallstreet" PowerBook.)

Harold

On 8/21/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Previous to 2.6.15/2.6.14, there where two kernel architectures, ppc and ppc64, with lot of duplication. In 2.6.15 the migration started for ppc64 to have a single architecture for both, namely powerpc, and this was completed for powerpc/chrp in 2.6.16, while prep and apus still stayed in ARCH=ppc, and
nubus is not ported to 2.6 yet.

If you get a kernel source, the thing is that the code changed between what
was in arch/ppc and now is in arch/powerpc.

This is a pretty major migration, and code changed, so for oldworld machines,
problems with 2.6.16 are pretty much linked to this migration.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to