> Funny, this one caused the Apple/Command key to produce M-s, > that is, Meta-Super.
That is so whack. I'm not getting any of the same results you do. > This gives me Alt and Meta as I want them in Emacs, but with > an additional strange twist: M-TAB gets captured by Emacs without cycling > windows as altwin:meta_win does; and outside of Emacs, only the first time > M-TAB gets used it cycles windows, after that it only produces the effect > of TAB, that is, changing input fields... I had another idea. It seems that altwin:meta_win gives you what you want, but only on display :0. Run the program `setxkbmap -v 6`; it should show you the list of Xkb mappings it applies by default (and applies them). I bet the results are different on :0 and :1. Or by running this on :1, it will set the altwin:meta_win to what you want. If it shows differences, you can use setxkbmap -option altwin:meta_win (or something) to set them to the same thing. If that works, then there's a bug with how XFree handles alternate kemaps on secondary displays. > Yes, GNU/Linux is still far away from the average user... Yeah. Anything having to do with low-level access for common desktop needs is underpowered. Keyboard, mouse, sound, USB. It's coming together, but slowly. I think the real requirements aren't well defined, so there are a lot of different solutions. Just look at the list of sound solutions! Frank
