On Don, 2003-03-20 at 21:02, Vincent Strubel wrote: > On Thursday 20 March 2003 18:11, you wrote: > > > > a gentoo (nobody's perfect...) and running xfree-4.3.0 and gentoo's > > > xfree-drm (should be same source as debian drm-trunk-modules). > > > > I hope not. It would be foolish of Gentoo to use bleeding edge CVS > > snapshots. > > You're right, I may have spoken too quickly. The current "testing" (as of > gentoo) ebuild uses a source archive from the developper's website: > http://cvs.gentoo.org/~gerk/distfiles/drm-trunk.tar.gz > But it is the same (according to cmp) as what I get after running dpkg-deb -x > on your drm-trunk-module-src_2002.12.05-3_all.deb, from > people.debian.org/~daenzer, and once untarred it still has the > modules/drm-trunk/debian/changelog.m4 saying: > drm-trunk-module-KVERS (KDREV+2002.12.05-3) unstable; urgency=low > > Portage only patches the Makefile.linux (most of it is for ease of use with > emerge, apparently) before building it, with the patch quoted at the end of > this message. > > > As others have pointed out, it must be the AGPMode (it never occurred to > > me that this could help for sleep because higher AGP transfer rates > > traditionally tended to be problematic...) because ForcePCIMode defaults > > to false and you can't use the UniNorth agpgart without > > http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/drm-ioremapagp.diff . Are you using > > that? If not, that would be interesting because the AGPMode option would > > seem to have an effect without AGP GART actually being used. > > Indeed, it works with just "AGPMode" "4", no ForcePCIMode nor DRIReinit > (except I get less garbage on the screen on snooze). And I'm not using the > drm-ioremapagp.diff, as far as I can tell.
Yes, you are, because it's included in my drm-trunk.tar.gz. So it does make sense, *phew* :) > Just to make sure, I rebuilt my drm modules from > drm-trunk-module-src_2002.12.05-3_all.deb, > and it works just as fine (or is the patch already included in that?). In > both > cases I get an (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONDRIResume: CP resume -1007 > on the console but it doesn't seem to have an impact (dri is still okay after > resuming). Looks like Charl P. Botha's DRI resume patch. I suggested to him some improvements, one of which would eliminate this harmless error message (which is due to the counterpart in the DRM missing). -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
