Michel,
Considering that the drm code has changed enough in the past
that we have two versions in Linux 2.4 (legacy XFree86 4.0 and
XFree86 4.1), why wouldn't the drm code fork yet again at some
point in the XFree86 cvs? If one were running Linux 2.5 and it
was sync'd to the drm code in XFree86 drm cvs I would imagine
such problems wouldn't arise. Is the kernel drm API frozen since
4.1 so that we will never see a Linux kernel with say
XFree86 4.0 and 4.1 as legacy and XFree86 4.3 (aka drm cvs)
as the new standard drm?
Jack- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Fabrice Medio
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Michel D�nzer
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Fabrice Medio
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Jack Howarth
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Michel D�nzer
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Fabrice Medio
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Michel D�nzer
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Fabrice Medio
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Jack Howarth
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Michel D�nzer
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Jack Howarth
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Michel D�nzer
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Fred Heitkamp
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Vincent Bernat
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Rade... Fred Heitkamp
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Radeon M7 florian
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Radeon M7 florian
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Radeon M7 Michel D�nzer
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Radeon M7 florian
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Radeon M7 Michel D�nzer
- Re: DRI not working with ATI Radeon M7 Michel D�nzer

