On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 09:06, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > (this would imply UseFBDev probably?). > > > > Depends if the implementation of the two heads is done in the > > framebuffer device or in the X server driver. > > Yep. The chances of me ever mucking with the X server driver are zero, the > chances of mucking with the fb code are just slim (and that wouldn't be on > r128 anyway, just scouting out some ideas).
Well, for Mach64, doing this in the framebuffer device is really useless for X (unless someone implements generic support for framebuffer devices) because the atimisc driver doesn't support UseFBDev. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
