On 17 Apr, this message from Nicholas Ingolia echoed through cyberspace: > I and others I know get similar numbers and have perfect wireless > performance.
OK, thanks. Are your Link Quality readings comparable as well? > Are you aware that the signal and noise numbers are in logarithmic units, > meaning that the signal is more than 1000-fold stronger than the > noise? Oh yes, I know db calculations quite well. What struck me is that the Link Quality reading is consistently at something like 30% (i.e. 30/92), which does seem rather poor. If the -60dbm receive level is normal, then why leave so much room in the quality scale? What got me wondering as well is that I hardly get any network downstairs in the living room, when the base station is two floors up, in the office. The staiscase doesn't permit line-of-sight, of course, but it's not entirely closed with walls. Oh well, I'll move the base station around a bit. Cheers Michel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michel Lanners | " Read Philosophy. Study Art. 23, Rue Paul Henkes | Ask Questions. Make Mistakes. L-1710 Luxembourg | email [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cpu.lu/~mlan | Learn Always. "
