Cort Dougan wrote: > > } but for 2.4 i imagine paulus tree is best. the bk tree is bleeding > > Quite the opposite. The 2.4 and 2.2 BK kernels are quite stable. The > kernels that Paul keeps around (accessible via rsync) are experiments that > Paul doesn't push up to the BK tree, I believe.
So I've been running an experiment for some time now... might explain some oddities like ldconfig sporadically dying with an illegal instruction. :) If only the airport driver and/or Iain's dmasound driver were in the bk tree, and rsync would work again... -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project member
