Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > Patches are attached vs. 2.2.17 and 2.4.0-test8. If they seem good (i.e.
> > if > nobody says they're bad :-), I'll forward them.
>
> [...]
>
> > -CONFIG_UNIX=y
> > +CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV=m
> > +CONFIG_FIREWALL=y
> > +CONFIG_FILTER=y
> > +CONFIG_UNIX=m
>
> I remember that back when I started with Linux on APUS, it was a common
> mistake when building custom kernels to leave out UNIX sockets. Which would
> lead to havoc on the next boot. Isn't that a problem anymore? (E.g. if the
> module isn't available for some reason)
(slight tinge of embarassment...) Actually, I haven't tried it with
CONFIG_UNIX=m. This is what's on i386 now, not positive it
works on PPC. I'll try it next kernel I build.
The rest all works though.
-Adam P.
Welcome to the best software in the
world today cafe!
