Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Patches are attached vs. 2.2.17 and 2.4.0-test8. If they seem good (i.e. if > > nobody says they're bad :-), I'll forward them.
[...] > -CONFIG_UNIX=y > +CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV=m > +CONFIG_FIREWALL=y > +CONFIG_FILTER=y > +CONFIG_UNIX=m I remember that back when I started with Linux on APUS, it was a common mistake when building custom kernels to leave out UNIX sockets. Which would lead to havoc on the next boot. Isn't that a problem anymore? (E.g. if the module isn't available for some reason) Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and The DRI Project
