I sent the maintainer the patch awhile ago, just do an NMU... -matt
On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, luther sven wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 08:35:38AM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote: > > At 15:20 +0200 1999-06-14, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > >yes, sure, but it would be more convenient to have a true patch, any > > >link on how to > > >dissect rpm files without rpm installed ? i guess the srpms format is > > >upstream > > >source + a load of patches applied, isn't it ? > > > > <http://www.eleves.ens.fr:8080/home/espel/rpm2cpio>, rpm2cpio > > file.src.rpm | cpio --extract. > > > > srpms are a modified cpio archive containing the upstream tarball, > > zero or more patches, and the .spec file. > > Thanks, i extracted the srpm with rpm, and builded a gdb package with the > patch. it works fine. > > Is someone else interrested ? Should i make a NMU, or simply send the > maintainer of gdb the patch ? > > Friendly, > > Sven LUTHER > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >