On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 01:20 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I know, but this oneliner is incorrect. It can't be correct, no way. > > That is very strange, and that's what I'm trying to figure out. Can you > > try instead changing the start address of the flush from 0xfff00000 to 0 > > by changing the L1 flush bit initalisation from lis r4,0xfff0 to li > > r4,0 ? > > This fixes the problem.
Ok, I still don't have anything like a good explanation of why this fixes it, but it's a better workaround for now. Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
