On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 05:11 +0200, Esteban Martinez wrote: > Hi again. > > > [...] > > Actually ... just in case, do one test with > > radeon.default_dynclk=-1 > Well, I've tried it with the "radeon.default_dynclk=-1" option. Just booted, I > start X with DRI disabled and it works. But if I enable DRI, it crashes. > > After that, I've applied this last patch and make the same tests. And in both > cases it ocurrs the same: DRI disabled -> works, DRI enabled -> crashes. > With the patch applied there is no pause as you said. > > > [...] > > If that doesn't help, then I don't know at this point what can be > > causing the crash. All I can suggest is you go back kernel versions and > > sub versions until you can isolate more precisely when the crash started > > to happen... > > Ok, don't worry. As soon as possible I will try the others kernels. I don't > know if I've to try with 2.6.11.[1-6] or try with 2.6.11-rc1-bk[1-6]. I'm a > bit confused with this. By the moment I'll start with 2.6.11 plain, after > 2.6.11-rc1, after that 2.6.11-rc1-bk1, and so on. At the moment I see it > doesn't work, I will let you know. I tried with 2.6.10 plain and it worked > all.
if 2.6.11 plain doesn't work, go backward from that. The ordering is: 2.6.10 2.6.10-bk* 2.6.11-rc1 2.6.11-rc1-bk* 2.6.11-rc2 2.6.11-rc2-bk* etc... 2.6.11 2.6.11.x (1..7) are just small bug/security fixes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
