Hi,
On 14-12-2020 22:43, Sean Whitton wrote:
On Mon 30 Nov 2020 at 07:49PM +01, Bill Allombert wrote:
'not fail' here means that the script terminates with return code 0.
This is how I would read it too. Would a patch to add "(i.e. exit with
return code 0)" resolve the original submitter's concerns?
Though I'm still not convinced it's a sensible requirement, that
clarification would resolve my main concern (i.e. having to fix init
scripts to work with an absent defaults file). By the way, there's an
identical requirement a few paragraphs before, so it might be good to
insert the same clarification there as well.
Cheers,
Oxan
