Hello, On Tue 02 Apr 2024 at 04:18pm +01, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Sean Whitton wrote: >> On Tue 26 Mar 2024 at 10:11am -06, Sam Hartman wrote: >> > I tend to agree with Sean that your rationale is not convincing. >> > It sounds like you want to use policy as a stick to hit people >> > over the head and say "policy is not a stick." >> >> This was basically my concern. > > This feels like a painful mischaracterization of what I said. I don't > want to use policy as a stick. I want to make policy less usable as a > stick. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to be pejorative. I was meaning to say something more like "you can't fight fire with fire", rather than saying you actively wanted to use Policy like a stick. I'm sorry I was so terse. -- Sean Whitton
