Sean Whitton wrote: > On Tue 26 Mar 2024 at 10:11am -06, Sam Hartman wrote: > > I tend to agree with Sean that your rationale is not convincing. > > It sounds like you want to use policy as a stick to hit people > > over the head and say "policy is not a stick." > > This was basically my concern.
This feels like a painful mischaracterization of what I said. I don't want to use policy as a stick. I want to make policy less usable as a stick. Nonetheless, if the Policy editors are opposed to documenting something despite it being collectively known to be the case, and do not feel that any possible wording change would change that position, then I will not push for it further.
