On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 11:18:35AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > If I get no pushbacks I'll also propose some text later on when I'm > freer (unless somebody beats me to it!).
I'm hereby seeking seconds (or, well, suggestions for improvements) for the following diff, which is based on daa7d69fbffc1c438002993860f0df407e4aaeb1 (4.6.0.1): |--- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst |+++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst |@@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ package) are: | | - :ref:`Rules-Requires-Root <s-f-Rules-Requires-Root>` | |+- :ref:`Description <s-f-Description>` |+ | The fields in the binary package paragraphs are: | | - :ref:`Package <s-f-Package>` (mandatory) |@@ -652,9 +654,14 @@ orderings. [#]_ | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | In a source or binary control file, the ``Description`` field contains a |-description of the binary package, consisting of two parts, the synopsis |-or the short description, and the long description. It is a multiline |-field with the following format: |+description of the package, consisting of two parts, the synopsis or the short |+description, and the long description. |+ |+When used in a source control file in the general paragraph (i.e., the first |+one, for the source package), the text in this field is relevant for all binary |+packages built by the given source package. |+ |+It is a multiline field with the following format: | | :: | I also pushed my change here: https://salsa.debian.org/mattia/policy/-/commit/807bd3ea551087df33c54c270e7f11151c8b0ae2 -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
