Hello, On Mon 22 Jul 2019 at 10:15am -04, David Steele wrote:
> The use of the systemd API blocks the work of those who don't like > systemd. Is that something that should that be addressed by Policy? I > don't think so. > > Under the scenario where the systemd api is used by a package, the > current Policy leads down a logical path resulting in vestigial init > scripts with calls to systemctl. Is that a preferred result, relative > to the proposed exception? > > I don't see how that ultimately meets anyone's goals for alternate init > support. Agreed, that's definitely not the preferred result. -- Sean Whitton
