UNSUBSCRIBE
On 06/14/2018 03:49 PM, Jess Hall wrote:
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 Sean Whitton wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14 2017, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:15:10AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
+maintainer's control. The specification should entail that the
+architecture-independent packages are buildable on at least two
+architectures.
[...]
Also, I dislike the sentence in itself, I believe it should be more
straightforward in conveying its meaning of "pretty please at least
two arch".
It has to be that way for cases like this:
Build-Indep-architecture: !amd64
That entails that it builds on at least two architectures, but on a
common reading of 'specify', it does not specify two archs.
How about "You should not specify that the packages are buildable on
only one architecture."?
