Hi, Quoting Javier Serrano Polo (2016-07-13 01:04:43) > Sorry, I missed your message. > > > I'm removing #757760 from the recipients because that bug should > > contain a discussion about the implementation of the current build > > profile spec and should not be a discussion platform for further > > additions or changes to the spec. Lets use debian-dpkg@ to discuss > > this issue. > > The BTS is my only way to keep an open discussion. I really cannot post to > lists.debian.org (I can to Alioth lists);
because of technical reasons?
> should I try to fix that?
If you want to discuss this issue, then yes.
> We can discuss in #830524.
A bug against Debian policy is not the right platform to discuss new features
or changes to existing functionality. Things get documented in Debian policy
*after* it has been agreed upon how we want them to work on other mailing
lists, IRC and/or real life. Then, the debian policy bts can be used to find
the right wording to express all this properly in natural language. Usually
discussions about project-wide features like this would happen on debian-devel@
but other lists are also possible. At maximum, I'd discuss changes like this in
a bug against dpkg, for example.
Also note, that I don't seem to be able to send you email directly because:
<jav...@jasp.net>: host www.jasp.net[62.43.138.54] said: 550-The message does
not meet the trust level of one recipient at least 550-See
http://www.jasp.net/smtp/trust.xhtml 550 Administrative prohibition (in
reply to end of DATA command)
Thanks!
cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
