Le Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 08:50:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 20:45:43 +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > > But policy says that there "should" be such a copyright file. Violating such > > a clause is at least an important bug. > > It's *at most* an important bug:
Hi all, I think that the disagreement here stems from that we are talking mostly about packages that are in the NEW queue and therefore are not in Debian yet. - Since they are not in Debian yet, they have no entry in the BTS, and therefore the definition of severity for issues is partly irrelevant, because: - the FTP team is free to refuse to review a package that they consider problematic enough. Here, the problem being when copyright information is too hard to find for review. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
