On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:20:38PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 11:52:14PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > It took me a bit longer than that (sorry about that), but you can now > > find attached to this mail my first attempt at adding the autopkgtest > > spec to the Debian Policy package. > > Friendly ping to the -policy folks. Had anyone a chance to look at my > patch and see if I should change anything to match your expectations? > > For now the only pending change I've accumulated is the one mentioned by > Martin, about removing the section "Implicit test control file for known > package types". If that's the only change missing, I'll be happy to send > you a final version of the patch. If not ... I'm all ears :-)
Lintian report some issues: W: debian-policy: doc-base-abstract-might-contain-extra-leading-whitespace autopkgtest:5 E: debian-policy: doc-base-file-references-missing-file autopkgtest:9 /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/package-tests.txt.gz E: debian-policy: doc-base-file-references-missing-file autopkgtest:12 /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/package-tests.html E: debian-policy: doc-base-file-references-missing-file autopkgtest:13 /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/package-tests.html Also, would you mind if I converted autopkgtest.md to DebianDoc-SGML ? I am concerned to have to deal with different quoting rules in different files. > Feel free also to let me know you prefer me to submit the patch in other > ways, e.g. as a proper bug report. Yes, it would be nice to have a proper bug number to include in the changelog. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141013195734.GB19442@yellowpig
