On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:04:12AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > "Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <o...@debian.org> writes: > > > Back then, the gnome maintainers added a dependency on another package, > > which happened to be providing an /sbin/init. This was allowed by the > > Debian Policy of the time as well as by the Debian archive. The > > maintainers of the Policy maintainers haven't tried to rule on this at > > all since then. How is this matter now magically taken off the Policy > > maintainers' hands (while it _is_ a matter of Policy) and become a > > matter for the technical committee? > > I appreciate what you're saying here (although I think 6.1.1 overrides > that), but as one of the delegated Policy Editors, I would immediately > punt such a question arising in the Policy context to the TC under 6.1.1 > and 6.1.3. There is absolutely no way the normal Policy maintenance > process could deal with this debate. > > If it makes you feel more comfortable with this process, please assume > that's happened.
It would be nice that other members from the policy tean could agree to that. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140207211351.ga4...@roeckx.be
