Charles Plessy wrote: > Sorry for the confusion between new field and new paragraph. Still, I think > that we are spending a lot of time discussing refinements that need to > demonstrate their usefulness by being adopted independantly by a broad number > of package maintainers.
Stepping back a little, do I understand correctly that you mean "No, I do not think License-Exception paragraphs would be useful"? That's useful feedback and surprising to me. More details would be welcome. Context: I have no interest in diverging from the standard copyright-format in packages I maintain. But I would use a License-Exception construct if it existed, and at least one copyright file would become shorter. Thanks, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAFzf2XwL01yXd2G=gkxehcsdqa2rvpfn1wjnb3hh9tqh0eu...@mail.gmail.com
