On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 09:59:37 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > This patch creates a new subsection for obsoleted fields. Alternatively > we can concentrate the information where it is, in 5.6.25. Deleting it > would cause some other sub-subsections to be renumbered, so I think that > it is better to avoid.
I'd prefer to not see the original sub-section left there, but renumbering is indeed not desirable; this could probably be removed once the switch to docbook. > diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml > index 5760a3f..75333b2 100644 > --- a/policy.sgml > +++ b/policy.sgml > @@ -2649,7 +2649,6 @@ Package: libc6 > <item><qref id="f-Source"><tt>Source</tt></qref> (mandatory)</item> > <item><qref id="f-Maintainer"><tt>Maintainer</tt></qref> > (mandatory)</item> > <item><qref id="f-Uploaders"><tt>Uploaders</tt></qref></item> > - <item><qref > id="f-DM-Upload-Allowed"><tt>DM-Upload-Allowed</tt></qref></item> > <item><qref id="f-Section"><tt>Section</tt></qref> > (recommended)</item> > <item><qref id="f-Priority"><tt>Priority</tt></qref> > (recommended)</item> > <item><qref id="sourcebinarydeps"><tt>Build-Depends</tt> et > al</qref></item> > @@ -2748,7 +2747,6 @@ Package: libc6 > <item><qref id="f-Version"><tt>Version</tt></qref> (mandatory)</item> > <item><qref id="f-Maintainer"><tt>Maintainer</tt></qref> > (mandatory)</item> > <item><qref id="f-Uploaders"><tt>Uploaders</tt></qref></item> > - <item><qref > id="f-DM-Upload-Allowed"><tt>DM-Upload-Allowed</tt></qref></item> > <item><qref id="f-Homepage"><tt>Homepage</tt></qref></item> > <item><qref id="f-VCS-fields"><tt>Vcs-Browser</tt>, <tt>Vcs-Git</tt>, > et al.</qref></item> > <item><qref > id="f-Standards-Version"><tt>Standards-Version</tt></qref> > (recommended)</item> > @@ -3749,20 +3747,11 @@ Checksums-Sha256: > </p> > </sect1> > > - <sect1 id="f-DM-Upload-Allowed"> > + <sect1> > <heading><tt>DM-Upload-Allowed</tt></heading> > > <p> > - Indicates that Debian Maintainers may upload this package to > - the Debian archive. The only valid value is <tt>yes</tt>. If > - the field <tt>DM-Upload-Allowed: yes</tt> is present in the > - source section of the source control file of the most recent > - version of a package in unstable or experimental, the Debian > - archive will accept uploads of this package signed with a key > - in the Debian Maintainer keyring. See the General > - Resolution <url id="http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003"; > - name="Endorse the concept of Debian Maintainers"> for more > - details. > + Obsolete, see <qref id="f-DM-Upload-Allowed">below</qref>. > </p> > </sect1> > > @@ -3858,6 +3847,28 @@ Checksums-Sha256: > > </sect> > > + <sect id="obsolete-control-data-fields"> > + <heading>Obsolete fields</heading> > + > + <p> > + The following fields have been obsoleted and may be found in packages > + conforming with previous versions of the Policy. (Formatting nitpick, these two lines are not aligned.) > + </p> > + > + <sect1 id="f-DM-Upload-Allowed"> > + <heading><tt>DM-Upload-Allowed</tt></heading> > + > + <p> > + Indicates that Debian Maintainers may upload this package to > + the Debian archive. The only valid value is <tt>yes</tt>. This Maybe these sentences should be switched to past tense? > + field was used to regulate uploads by Debian Maintainers, See the > + General Resolution <url > id="http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003"; > + name="Endorse the concept of Debian Maintainers"> for more details. > + </p> > + </sect1> > + > + </sect> > + > </chapt> Seconded (w/ or w/o the above comments addressed). Thanks, Guillem
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
