Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > the policy currently doesn't explain all aspects and especially not all
> > restrictions of the DM-Upload-Allowed field usage.
>
> Not that the implementation WILL change. And I see no reason to explain
> the implementation inside policy.
Well, ok, but at least the intention should be clear. The current
state obviously confuses and misleads people. And that's a thing which
should definitely be fixed.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627220846.gq3...@sym.noone.org
