Le Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 07:45:08PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : > Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> writes: > > > I think that it is a bit drastic. In the case of dpkg-buildpackage, I > > agree that we should not repeat information found in the manual page, > > but I like the short explanations on the purpose of each Dpkg helper > > tool. > > We've been wanting to remove those appendices for a long time, actually. > While having a tour of dpkg helper tools is an interesting piece of > documentation to have, it seems pretty far afield of the point of Policy.
That is a good alternative (also discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/598645). However, I think that it would be nice make the correction proposed by Sam if a proper removal of the whole appendix is not coming soon. Cheers, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120212053637.gc8...@falafel.plessy.net
