Le Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:53:45AM +0000, Ximin Luo a écrit : > It is not "perfecting the document", it's addressing the core problem of this > bug. It's really not that significant a change.
Hello again, I read again the whole bug discussion. For most of the propositions, all the participants, you included, agreed that they are not in the scope of the version 1.0 that we really want to publish soon. For other points, for instance that stand-alone license sections can also accept short names accompanied by their license exception, a clarification would not hurt; but I do not consider this a blocking problem. Unfortunately, you have included at least one normative change, the recommendation to collate short names that are identical except for a terminal “plus” character, that has direct consequences on parsing and is therefore not acceptable for the version 1.0. Have a nice week-end, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120203145820.ga23...@merveille.plessy.net
