Russ Allbery wrote: > A scheme that would always satisfy this would be to use +<letter><version> > for stable/security updates where <version> is the Debian version being > targeted similar to how that's done for backports (so 50 for lenny or 60 > for squeeze), and <letter> is some letter between b and n. (Alternately, > we could use a different convention for NMUs than +nmu, but that's so > self-explanatory that it would be nice to stick with it.)
Interesting. +d60 for "Debian 6.0". :) What happens when there are more than 10 updates for a single Debian version? Maybe that's not worth worrying about --- such a package is either horribly buggy or should be using a more sensible versioning scheme (e.g., ia32-libs and clamav-data just use the date). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120108230934.GA21827@burratino
