On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: >> I believe it should also document the N.N standard for >> NMUs of non-native packages, since people don't seem inclined to change to >> +nmu and there's probably no reason to do so.
I suppose this isn't a compelling argument, but it's just rather strange that two different schemes/standards are in play here. As a temporary transition, the wording could say non-native nmus can be versioned with either +nmun or n.n with +nmun favored as that will become the standard in the future. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MP_+UsG5zMojO=-ccvz9+fdc9ennuf+qs3twods_sk...@mail.gmail.com
