* Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org>, 2012-01-02, 13:51:
<p> A common example of when a change to <var>minimal-version</var> is required is a function that takes an enum or struct argument that controls what the function does. For example: <example> enum library_op { OP_FOO, OP_BAR }; int library_do_operation(enum library_op); </example> If a new operation, <tt>OP_BAZ</tt>, is added, the <var>minimal-version</var> of <tt>library_do_operation</tt> must be increased to the version at which <tt>OP_BAZ</tt> was introduced. Otherwise, a binary built against the new version of the library (having detected at compile-time that the library supports <tt>OP_BAZ</tt>) may be installed with a shared library that doesn't support <tt>OP_BAZ</tt> and will fail at runtime when it tries to pass <tt>OP_BAZ</tt> into this function. </p>
Hmm. It was my understanding that one of the purposes of Build-Depends-Package is to avoid bumping symbol versions in situations like this.
-- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120103232901.ga9...@jwilk.net