Russ Allbery wrote: > Note that I'm not arguing against changing things in xterm, particularly > in conjunction with upstream. Just that I'm not sure it's worth writing a > policy about this, rather than making decisions specifically about the > xterm package to make it work better, better serve its users, etc.
I guess I wasn't clear. The proposal had two parts: 1) standardizing on a default sequence to send for Alt+letter combinations 2) documenting in policy that advertising the smm capability is a Bad Idea. The first part seems to be what you have been responding to, and I've already said it's not a big deal to me. The second part seems more important, and it doesn't involve changing xterm at all. Thanks for your thoughtfulness, and hoping that clarifies a little. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111205101040.gb9...@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net
