Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes: > Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Basically, I'm dubious the gain from this is worth the effort. Presumably >> Thomas has some reason for making xterm's default what it is currently, if >> only "it's always been that way." > The xterm terminfo entry does not currently advertise the smm > capability, if I am reading "infocmp xterm" output correctly. Note that I'm not arguing against changing things in xterm, particularly in conjunction with upstream. Just that I'm not sure it's worth writing a policy about this, rather than making decisions specifically about the xterm package to make it work better, better serve its users, etc. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87pqg38hjf....@windlord.stanford.edu
