user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org usertags 628515 normative discussion thanks
Le Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 04:39:33AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > Jakub Wilk wrote: > > * Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com>, 2011-11-26, 18:37: > > [...] > >> I do not suspect there is a > >> consensus for this. > > > > Why do you think there is not? > > I was guessing, it seems incorrectly, based on the lack of seconds > or other discussion on this policy proposal. Dear all, as a maintainer who turned on verbosity on his build logs, I would be fine with either implementation, together with the message that we (as a project) would like verbose logs on the buildds unless they cause problems for instance with their size, that is, a “should” recommendation. I think that the best way to see which of verbose or noverbose is to be chosen would be to go through the soft release goal or release recommendation that Matthias advocated. Once the mayonnaise thickens (once the recommendation is followed), then it will have its place in the Policy. That of course does not prevent volunteers to work on the wording in advance if they feel so. But the critical step is to induce other developers to follow the idea. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111128014328.gd26...@merveille.plessy.net
