Steve, it has been monthes that we are waiting for you to say more precisely what is wrong with the current text. Your comments were promised by Lars for April:
“Steve, my co-driver, says he has a couple of issues he wants to fix before we are finished with DEP5. He'll write patches and submit them for discussion about next weekend or so.” http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00527.html You write “I'm inclined to ignore this altogether in favor of working on the real problems with the text.” If I may suggest a starting point, there is http://bugs.debian.org/609160#146 Also, Stefano asked you for a timeline on debian-project: http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2011/09/msg00028.html You mention in http://bugs.debian.org/633797 “the list of issues that I consider blockers”. Please share it. Lastly, you mention in this current thread: “I don't think I'm going to merge this into the dep repo”. If you mean to fork the latest draft that is developed in the debian-policy Git repository, I ask you do reconsider. In any case, your comments and patches are welcome. But I find it unacceptable to constantly push the emergency stop button without precise justification. -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111115030332.gc8...@merveille.plessy.net
