Le Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:56:54PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius a écrit : > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 07:24:47AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > I do not know how to write this diplomatically, and my request to have my > > patch > > applied was a clumsy way to re-open the discussion without mentionning the > > above email, but if 1) the only changes before the DEP is accepted are > > Steve's > > changes, and 2) the DEP can not be accepted before Steve changes it, then > > Steve > > please submit your patches and let's go ahead ? > > thank you for insinuating that I would reject something because > you suggest it, and accept the same thing from Steve.
Hi Lars, I am not making insinuations. I try my best in all my emails to avoid style figures that may create misunderstandings, especially that I am not a native English speaker. I am just pointing out that the situation is blocked if driver A wants no changes before declaring the DEP accepted, and driver B wants some changes before the DEP is accepted. I think that we need to discuss this frankly. I am all for either marking the DEP accepted, or making a new round of modifications, but sorry for pointing finger, I think that we waited enough for Steve's input. It is for sure valuable, but his latest email in this thread shows that it is not ready. I have seen many projects sunk by trying to involve skilled people who unfortunately do not have time, and I have the impression that this DEP has this problem. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110830065756.ga2...@merveille.plessy.net
