On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 02:30:34PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 04:41:28PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > given that DEP 5 is still in the CANDIDATE state, and given that the change > > is > > not normative, I was wondering if the patch I sent in November 2011, > > reproduced > > below for your convenience, could be applied in the end.
> My opinion on this hasn't changed. I'm still hoping that the DEP5 spec > will properly integrated into the policy package soon, and I would prefer > to see that happening, so that my involvement in it can end, than make > any other changes right now. My opinion also has not changed: I think there are significant language bugs in the current draft that should be fixed before this is ready to be adopted as a standard. Whether these are dealt with via the DEP process or on debian-policy makes no difference to me, but I for one am not happy to see this integrated into policy as-is. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
