Le Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 08:40:57PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > On 25/07/11 at 04:25 +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This bug came up for discussion this evening at DebConf; I think it's > > overdue to be followed through on. Lucas seems to agree in the end with my > > own believe that there is a weak consensus in favor of the proposed policy, > > and it does effectively reflect current practice, so I think applying this > > patch in some form is the right thing. > > > > The biggest remaining point of contention seems to be whether an RC bug > > which has had a response from a maintainer indicating that it's in progress > > should be covered by the "0 day" policy after 7 days, or if it should be > > covered by the "2 day" policy. Since this is contentious, I propose the > > more conservative policy be applied, as per the attached patch. > > > > Comments? > > ACK
Yes, let's move forward. -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110725225744.ga24...@merveille.plessy.net
