Hello, This bug came up for discussion this evening at DebConf; I think it's overdue to be followed through on. Lucas seems to agree in the end with my own believe that there is a weak consensus in favor of the proposed policy, and it does effectively reflect current practice, so I think applying this patch in some form is the right thing.
The biggest remaining point of contention seems to be whether an RC bug which has had a response from a maintainer indicating that it's in progress should be covered by the "0 day" policy after 7 days, or if it should be covered by the "2 day" policy. Since this is contentious, I propose the more conservative policy be applied, as per the attached patch. Comments? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
Index: pkgs.dbk =================================================================== --- pkgs.dbk (revision 8898) +++ pkgs.dbk (working copy) @@ -1947,6 +1947,11 @@ <itemizedlist> <listitem> <para> +Upload fixing only release-critical bugs older than 7 days, with no maintainer activity on the bug for 7 days and no indication that a fix is in progress: 0 days +</para> +</listitem> +<listitem> +<para> Upload fixing only release-critical bugs older than 7 days: 2 days </para> </listitem>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
