Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> writes: > On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 12:57:50 +1200, Andrew McMillan wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 17:05 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>> Our footnote system is not great, so I'd keep it as one footnote. I agree >>> with putting GNU/Hurd first, but I'd like to keep the structure of listing >>> the exceptions after a colon to match the other item. So, how about: >>> >>> On GNU/Hurd systems, the following additional directories are allowed >>> in the root filesystem: <file>/hurd</file> and <file>/servers</file>. >>> <footnote> >>> These directories are used to store translators and as a set of >>> standard names for mount points, respectively. >>> </footnote> >> All good reasons so let's go with that one then. > Yeah, agreed. Given that it seems the wording has been transferred to > Russ now, :) I'll happily second it if there's the need, but I'm not > sure how you want to handle that, any way is fine by me though. This has now been merged for the next release. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8762y231dx....@windlord.stanford.edu
