Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes: > Russ Allbery wrote: >> Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes:
>>> I might also add at the end: >>> In such situations, the depended-on package should perform an >>> equivalent clean-up operation if it's the first package to be >>> removed or purged. >>> But that may not be unambiguous enough to add any value here and I >>> can't be bothered to further tune the language right now; I don't >>> think that's a blocker and this bug has run quite long enough already. >> I'm going to bail on that because of the length of the bug > Reasonable. When making a suggestion for a new normative requirement > like that, I probably should have just filed a new (low-severity) policy > bug. Please do feel free if you think it looks worthwhile to document. > [...] >> Does that look okay? > Yes, that is much clearer. > Thanks again, and sorry to nitpick so. It's much appreciated, actually. I want to improve the clarity of the language, so other people checking it for clarity is always helpful. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k4nk994k....@windlord.stanford.edu
