Russ Allbery wrote: > Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes: >> I might also add at the end: > >> In such situations, the depended-on package should perform an equivalent >> clean-up operation if it's the first package to be removed or purged. > >> But that may not be unambiguous enough to add any value here and I can't >> be bothered to further tune the language right now; I don't think that's >> a blocker and this bug has run quite long enough already. > > I'm going to bail on that because of the length of the bug
Reasonable. When making a suggestion for a new normative requirement like that, I probably should have just filed a new (low-severity) policy bug. [...] > Does that look okay? Yes, that is much clearer. Thanks again, and sorry to nitpick so. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100818222815.gb2...@burratino
