-=| gregor herrmann, Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:50:36AM +0200 |=- > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:54:45 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I therefore propose adding GPL version 1 to the list of licenses > > said by > > Policy to be in common-licenses and asking Santiago to include a copy in > > base-files. I'm not including a diff since it would just create merge > > conflicts with the BSD diff proposed earlier today and because it's fairly > > obvious, although I can if people would prefer. > > > > Objections or seconds? > > Seconded.
Seconded too. I must admit I am very surprised GPL-1 is not in common-licenses. > > Copying debian-perl on this message since that's the set of developers who > > are most affected by this. > > Thanks! > > (Although that means some changes on our part, in dh-make-perl and in > most of our packages :)) Reading the above, I am left with the impression that our packages should point to GPL-1 one way or another, so having to change a few words is a lot less burden than including the license text in debian/copyright. Thanks for the heads up! I'll take care of dh-make-perl.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
