On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 05:44:30PM -0500, Brian Ryans wrote:
> Quoting Russ Allbery on 2010-06-09 13:36:22:
> > The low bar for licenses included in common-licenses by license count is
> > the GFDL, at 875 packages using it in some version. None of the licenses
> > for which we have open bugs reach that package count. The closest is the
> > MPL version 1.1, at 654 packages.
> Perhaps an addition to policy to clarify such matters, something to the
> effect of "A license should be placed in common-licenses if {x% of
> Debian packages use it | y bytes will be saved by its inclusion}", would
> be useful? [1].
I don't think that clarification belongs in Policy.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100613184545.ga5...@dario.dodds.net
