Hi,
I have now updated the README docs with a slightly cleaner
work-flow. I would like to get a show of hands from the policy team
about this; and if people are OK with this approach (using org-mode,
with perhaps me committing to maintaining these documents in the
team), or abandoning this approach and going to plain old
HTML/docbook.
Personally, I think that the .org files are easier to edit, even for
people who are unfamiliar with org-mode, and are mroe readable than
SGML based documents, and thus would have higher utility, but I'll
abide with what the rest of the team thinks.
manoj
Manoj Srivastava (4):
[bug545548-srivasta]: Add Documentation
[bug545548-srivasta]: Make upgradng-checklist a real HTML file
[bug545548-srivasta]: Arrange to regenerate derived files from org
source
[bug545548-srivasta]: Use a less confusing merge work-flow in the
README
.gitignore | 1 -
Makefile | 11 +
Process.html | 423 ++++
Process.org | 205 ++
Process.txt | 216 ++
README-css.el | 81 +
README.html | 691 ++++++
README.org | 359 +++
README.txt | 346 +++
debian/rules | 27 +-
upgrading-checklist.html | 2373 ++++++++++++++------
upgrading-checklist.org | 798 +++++++
...ading-checklist.html => upgrading-checklist.txt | 187 +-
13 files changed, 4950 insertions(+), 768 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Process.html
create mode 100644 Process.org
create mode 100644 Process.txt
create mode 100644 README-css.el
create mode 100644 README.html
create mode 100644 README.org
create mode 100644 README.txt
create mode 100644 upgrading-checklist.org
copy upgrading-checklist.html => upgrading-checklist.txt (87%)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
