Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> writes: > Fair enough. I am including a README.txt (I also have a > README.html from the same source, which I am not posting here, in order > not to get distracted by font and color issues).
> How does the following look? I suspect that the process document is even more important than the mechanics of maintenance, although it does make sense to me to have both of them in the package. I'm not a big fan of wikis in general -- I mostly use them with minor grumbling when the people I'm working with want them -- so I'm happy personally to have all this information canonically live in the debian-policy package instead of the wiki. But we obviously don't want to try to maintain it in two places. Were you thinking of turning the wiki page into a pointer to the package, or did you have a cross-conversion or cross-update method in mind? -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
