Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <poch...@gmail.com> writes: > Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> So I think at this point it is premature for policy to decide >> one way or the other about debug symbol packages being mentioned in >> the control file (and dsc and changes). > They should be in the changes file so they are uploaded together with it > to the archive (and so dak can process them). Not saying that should be > mentioned in policy though :) Well, there's little point in having a standards document if we don't use it to describe what we're doing, not that we always manage to update it sufficiently quickly. > Having them in the Binary section in the .dsc and Binary and Description > in the .changes files would mean modifying > dpkg-buildpackage/dpkg-genchanges for ddebs not listed in > debian/control. However listing them in Files and Checksum-* in the > .changes requires no changes if you add the files to debian/files and > use dpkg-genchanges. It sounds like listing them only in *.changes but not in *.dsc or debian/control may be the easiest approach. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
