On Tue, Aug 11 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 11 août 2009 à 10:11 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>> Except you have not indicated how you (or debhelper) is going to
>> intercept ld to add the requisite arguments.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2009/07/msg01229.html
So the proposal is to add --enable-linker-build-id to CFLAGS?
OK, I guess that would work. But you still have the advantage,
using the current debug link mechanism, of looking to see if you have
debug symbols for a given executable/library easily, without having to
compute potentially 3 checksums (depending on which algorithm was
selected at build time) and trying to match that (in multiple
directories).
Can you point ot me the disadvantage of continuing to use what
dh_strip does now?
manoj
--
I have the simplest tastes. I am always satisfied with the best. Oscar
Wilde
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
